This month, HES took a deep dive into articles on race, ethnicity, and COVID-19. We discussed three articles: one on the role of bias in testing and diagnosis rates; another on racial disparities in COVID-19 prevalence in CT; and a third on what causes disparities in COVID-19 impact. While we agreed that the data was not new to any of us, we discussed two key issues in advocating for health equity during this pandemic. First, we considered who is left out of the COVID-19 data, given the limited nature of testing at this time. While we cannot yet answer this question, we wondered if the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 infection and death would appear even more dramatic if the data were more complete. Our takeaway was that we want our efforts to be cognizant of how much is unknown in the midst of this crisis. Second, we discussed how health equity is discussed in the media and how we can work to communicate injustice without making comparisons that may be misread to imply that one population is making better choices than another. We know this implication is both untrue and often assumed. This part of our discussion ended in two key takeaways: First, it is often more clear and helpful to cite disproportionate impact than disparities. For example, we can say that Black/African American residents of CT accounted for 15% of COVID-19 related deaths and 10% of the population rather than comparing deaths of people who identify as Black/African American to deaths of people who identify as white. Second, when time and space allow and data for more than one population is being shared, it is helpful to provide context and note that disparities are a symptom of larger structural inequities that create or limit opportunities for different communities in different ways. Want to help us read more? See our desired list of reading material HERE | |